The Dumbing Down of the Electorate
This years election will change the way candidates are selected and campaigns are run forever.
According to opensecrets.org, as of October 27, 2008 the two candidates combined had raised just shy of 1 billion dollars (that’s nine zeros!) Barack Obama raised just shy of three quarters of that at $639 million and spent $573 million, John McCain came in with a paltry $360 million spending ‘just’ $293 million. What a gross misuse of money. I certianly understand there’s a cost involved, but this is just grotesque. In the past decade money has become more and more of an indicator of a candidates success. Early pre-primary reports focus on fund raising successes rather than substantive things like… say… ISSUES! 2008 has set a new bar for future elections, a new standard as to how much you need to buy an election… Can you think of any better uses for a BILLION dollars? … I sure can.
Secondly, I saw several disturbing interviews yesterday on several different networks. Reporters were outside of polling locations asking black voters if race was an important factor in this years election. Every one of them answered with an emphatic YES. One lady in particular said that race was the only factor that she considered. She said it was about time to have a black man as president. Exit polls show that 80% of black voters voted for Obama. Barack Obama won Washington DC with a 93% margin and had similar results in the demographically similar neighboring county of Prince Georges County Maryland and Baltimore City. This should be an exceedingly troubling statistic for all Americans. I for one can say that race had absolutely nothing to do with my vote, that issue never even made it on my list of things I care about. How is voting for someone because they are black any less racist than voting for someone because they aren’t black? In my opinion (one obviously not shared by the media) this election was a huge step backward for racial equaltiy. I think we just added decades to any hope of eliminating racial inequality in this country.
Whatever happened to issues? Doesn’t anyone care anymore? The media was so concerned about ‘making history’ that they ignored everything substantive (That’s another issue… grrr… journalism is officially dead in America). In future elections we’ll be seeing money, media and irrelevant superficialities becoming the norms which define campaigns… further contributing to the dumbing down of the electorate.
Subscribe to Posts
QueenMother
says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 3:39 pm“…….we’ll be seeing money, media and irrelevant superficialities becoming the norms which define campaigns”
Maybe I have been around too long, but ever since I have been voting…since the Kennedy era….I remember those items cited in the above quote as the driving factors in political campaigns. This one just had more spectacular electronics and graphics. Hmmmm, wonder if they had a LightViper in Grant Park last night?
It was inevitable that race would be an issue with a bi-racial candidate running (notice I’m not calling him black?). I agree with you on the reverse-discrimination point but why do you think having a bi-racial president a set-back to equality?
BTW, regarding McCain….if he ran his campaign with the same sincerity that he showed last night in his concession speech, he might have had a better chance …..he gave an outstanding speech. I always wondered during the campaign “where was the real John McCain?”.
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 4:25 pmI didn’t say a black president is a backward step. It’s the fact that a huge percentage of the people that voted for him did so because he was black. Voting for a president (or any office for that matter) strictly (or even primarily) based on race is inexcusable. This is the biggest demonstration of racal bias we’ve seen in half a decade.
QueenMother
says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 5:52 pmThanks for setting that straight. I re-read the blog and see what you mean.
Christian Beyer
says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 7:40 pmActually, in spite of the exit polls, the numbers are that much different, when broken down racially and demographically, as they were when Clinton won his second term.
Issues? What issues? The way it looks to most Americans, the issues of import during a presidential campaign soon take a back seat to more pressing issues once the man is the Oval Office. Left is left and Right is right and always the twain shall meet once the election is over.
So character and personality become important, to everyone. I think Reagan was a great president but it wasn’t just his stand on the issues that made him so. He was presidential. Even those who opposed him, like McCain, can see that. And I think that was why he won. He looks and sounds and acts ‘presidential’. (In spite of his ears
)
Besides. he is not the first black president; he’s the first bi-racial and multicultural president.
Catherine, I agree with what you said about McCain. Great concession speech. And Obama was very gracious in return. I wonder if there might be a place in Obama’s cabinet for McCain. Like Secretary of Defense, maybe?
Christian Beyer
says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 7:43 pm“Actually, in spite of the exit polls, the numbers are NOT that much different…”
“Even those who opposed OBAMA,/b>, like McCain…”
So sorry. Please fix. Thank you.
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 8:41 pmEven character and personality have nothing to do with race…
I was deeply disturbed by the interviews I saw. These folks were praised for voting based on racial preference… I couldn’t believe it.
Imagine someone being praised by the media for saying “I voted for McCain because he was white.” That would be equally disturbing.
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 9:41 pmWhat about the $5.3b spent on the election. Anyone else have a problem with that?
Christian Beyer
says:
Added on November 5th, 2008 at 10:35 pmThe money is ridiculous. But so is the amount of money that many corporate executives, movie stars and pro athletes spend. If people want to give it to them then what are you going to do?
But you make a good point; not that I would vote for Nadir or Kucinic or Paul but it would be nice to hear what they have to say, nice to see them in a debate or two. Special interest groups, big business and the media choose our candidates for us.
As far as your analogy goes (people voting for McCain because he is white) there is a difference. There is a double standard. Sometimes there is good support for a double standard. I think in this case there certainly is.
I like Obama. I didn’t vote for him. But I didn’t vote for McCain either. That being said, I don’t know if the political differences between Obama and McCain are as significant as the fact that a black man has been elected as president almost 150 years after the Civil War. It is momentous and historical.
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on November 6th, 2008 at 9:45 amRacism will never go away if all we do is swap one form of racism for another, even if the other is done with ‘good’ intentions. Racism is racism.
Granted, Obama’s presidency is a huge event in the history of the US. It will be forever cast in the history books, as well it should. I’m not trying to take away from that.
RE the money:
While corporate execs, movie stars and pro athletes make huge amounts of money, you are mixing apples and oranges. They all actually have jobs and are performing a service to earn the money they are paid. There is a tangible product or service that is traded in commerce to fund their salaries.
Political campaigns solicit charitable donations given to people who are trying to get a job. $5 billion dollars spent to elect a candidate…. it makes me sick. And look at how the money was spent… again sickening. I’d love to see a candidate come out and say “if you want to support me in a financial way, send your donations directly to the gulf coast of Texas where people are still struggling to rebuild, send it to Appalachia where people are living in abandon truck trailers and lean-toos, send it to the underfunded inner cities who are overwhelmed with homeless…”. That would say a whole lot more than nasty viscious TV commercials, a football stadium with Greek columns, an expensive wardrobe or a half hour droning infomercial.
Christian Beyer
says:
Added on November 6th, 2008 at 12:04 pmSounds like you want a bit more government control. Maybe we should require that that the tv, radio and newspaper campaign ads for ALL the candidates running be equivalent and paid for by the state at prearranged prices?
Now as far as your charge of racism goes; if the candidate had been someone who was running on a racist ticket - “vote for me because I am black” - and had no other things to redeem him to the black electorate who voted for him - then I think you would have a stronger point. Obama is not the first black man to run for the presidency. He captured a greater percentage of the entire electorate, not just African Americans. In comparison what a few people said to exit pollers is irrelevant. (And often B.S.). This was in no way a racist election. If anything it transcended race in many ways.
Christian Beyer
says:
Added on November 6th, 2008 at 12:11 pmI want to clarify: I meant that what voters tell the exit pollsters is often B.S. Like all the folks that said they were going to voter for that black fellow in California and then never did.
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on November 6th, 2008 at 1:24 pmConstitutionally, elections are probably one thing the Government should be involved with.
How was the Kool Aid? I don’t have the energy to trudge through it all again, but as soon as anyone dared to criticize Obama, some congressman somewhere would come out and dub it as some veiled racist remark… remember the whole ‘George Wallace’ comment?
It doesn’t really matter now does it? I’m not claiming this was a racist election, it was primarily a vote ‘against’ Bush rather than ‘for’ anything. I’m just expressing my disappointment that many people openly admitted that they voted based on race and the media thought that was a wonderful thing. I think while racial relations may have taken two steps forward it also took at least one step back as well.
BTW: You didn’t vote for Nadir, Kucinic, Paul, Obama or McCain… please tell me you DID vote…
Christian Beyer
says:
Added on November 6th, 2008 at 2:33 pmI voted straight Libertarian all the way. Considering that I am in Maryland the outcome of the state’s electorate is a forgone conclusion. And considering the way I feel about the election process (not far off from the way you feel) I decide to join those who are ‘protesting’ the two party monopoly.
I forgot the guy’s name, btw.
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on November 6th, 2008 at 3:36 pmVery cool…