Terror Texts… Cannibalism, Rape and Murder in the Bible

Terror Bible Stories

Terror Bible Stories

I read this story today about a college in Iowa that is performing a musical using readings of the King James Version of six Old Testament stories about cannibalism, rape, murder and bears mauling children. They’re acting out the stories as they are read unaltered. No interpretation or additions, just acting them out dressed in Goth attire with Rock music accompaniment and a mosh pit.

This is awesome! I would love to see this play. It’s such validation for me. Validates what I’ve been saying about how these OT text hold huge riches that most fear to explore because they are uncomfortable or they ’seem’ to contradict what Jesus teaches in the Gospels. God carefully crafted the compilation of His Word. Every word that is written is there for a purpose… even if they make us uncomfortable.

I may have to write these guys and see if we can get an East Coast performance.

Here’s a couple of quotes from the creator and some of the actors:

“I was looking for terror text, stories I can say are thematically tied together because they are frightening and mysterious and terrifying,” Barker said. “That’s part of what we’re saying with this whole project that life and God himself are mysteries.”

“This particular project has affected the way I view negative emotions — grief, anger, bitterness and spite and hate. We are meant to be emotional people. The Bible in a lot of ways shows us that that’s OK,” she said. “We need to embrace that we’re going to be very, very sad and we won’t know what to do with that.

“These mysterious, dark stories of the Old Testament, they bring us face-to-face with the suffering of the world,” Barker said. “It says we are capable of great evil and we must not forget these stories and we have some serious things to be accountable for in our own lives as a group and individually.”

 

32 replies


  1. Cool. Two things though:

    Why the King James version? If “every word that is written is there for a purpose”? Because the King James is not necessarily the most accurate.

    And what do you think what Barker meant when he said; “It says we are capable of great evil and we must not forget these stories and we have some serious things to be accountable for in our own lives as a group and individually.”? Because it sounds like he is suggesting that some of those stories might not be about things that God actually ordained but maybe we just had him take the fall for them.


  2. Whew! Talk about ponderous syntax. Sorry.


  3. KJV: probably for the poetic (goth) language. Accurate?? That implies that man has the power to override Gods intention.

    What makes you think God ordained it? For example I glean that one of the stories they used is about Lot in Sodom. The townsmen desire to rape the angels and Lots offer to have them rape his daughters instead had nothing to do with Gods ordination. It has everything to do the great evil that man is capable of. God recognized that evil and was forced to purge it.


  4. I don’t.

    You don’t think that God allows man to circumvent his will? I know that you are not a big fan of predestination. I also know that God can,using the people that have faith in him, turn all things back to his purpose, even evil things. So to say that God did not ordain the Holocaust doesn’t meant that God cannot use the Holocaust for good (as difficult as that may sound to most of us).

    Which is how I take those difficult passages having to do with the genocidal actions of the Israelites. No matter how it is accounted for in scripture, I see these actions as being just as evil as Lot offering his daughters up for sexual sacrifice. Lot likely felt he was doing God’s will in protecting his guest. The marauding Israelites likely believed they were also doing God’s will.

    How did God purge that evil? How did God purge Lot’s evil? It’s not always so easy to identify. Just as the ways in which he purges evil today are not quite so obvious. Some would say that he no longer does so.


  5. I truly appreciate what you guys had to say here. I have been a member of the terror texts cast, and we are all so very humbled to have so much attention drawn to our small corner of the world. Though I am not an expert in the making of terror texts (being solely a student), I feel like I do have a good grasp of that which were doing here. First, our use of the KJV, though it be acknowledged as not the most accurate of translations, was intended to add a poetic nature to the script, and allow us to use language that is arcane in its sound and syntax. Therefore, though its accuracy may be called into question, the overall idea of the story pervades, and that is the more important virtue. Additionally, Jeff Barker (the director) wanted the entire play to be redone by any and all those who wish, so that people will see the merit of these stories that have often been neglected by Sunday School teachers (to use a popular phrase amongst those involved).
    To respond to the first comment, we of course do not believe that God ordaines rape and murder (nor do I have all the answers as to why he told his children of Israel to go to war against fellow human beings), but you are correct in stating that God is fully capable of turning all evil to good. The whole idea of free will and choice is that mankind can choose to follow the easy path, or we can turn and follow him. Though we will certainly make mistakes and fall prone to our sinful nature, it is the act following him, maintaining our humility, repenting of our evil deeds, and loving and keeping faith in Him that makes us who we are (we can argue theology later…not to mention the fact that I surely got something wrong here…but I’m a music major, not a Religion or theology major!)
    Also, please note that we did not use the tale of Lot and Sodom in our musical.
    This show is all about reclaiming biblical texts in manners such as live theatre, so that everyone may enjoy them (or perhaps more correctly, ponder them), as we do some of the more popular sections of the bible. These texts, though not forgotten (especially by theologians and biblical scholars), are often passed over by (and I carefully tread here) many Christians (I, myself, am guilty of such). As such, we wanted to popularize these stories about the darkness of humanity, so that people could ponder the difficult questions that they pose.
    Many have also theorized that the texts of the Old Testament were originally poetic, and sung or recited in order to facilitate memorization and worship with such texts. Therefore, it’s a very short distance from such thought to actual performance onstage.
    Finally, many have accused us of treating the bible too lightly, using the grungy, gothic, otherworldly motif in a manner that is irreverent to the texts, and serves only to entertain. In reality, this is the exact opposite of that which we are doing in Terror Texts. We treat each of these stories with a great deal of reverence and respect, and all here acknowledge each night before a show that it is all “to the King.” The grungy, gothic theme is intended to create a completely different world than that of the audience, and the “tribal” feel pervades as well. Both work (cohesively, mind you) to encourage the audience to depart from their seats, rocket back to the Israel of antiquity, and observe some of the atrocities that mankind is capable of committing. The themes also serve to connect a modern audience with stories that are anything but modern in nature, but also remind them that even cultures such as our own are capable of committing evil…we need not be ancient nor uncultured to bring evil and hateful deeds unto our fellow man.
    The musical finishes with an a cappella piece which simply states “do remember me.” It reminds the audience that the people in the tales are just like them, and that they should all take care to remember the stories, for they carry great importance and great lessons to be learned.
    (note also, the likelihood that we could come out for a performance on the east coast is insanely small, but you could contact Jeff Barker, our theatre prof and director for tour info. maybe our drama ministries ensemble could tour it)


  6. Austin,

    Thanks for coming by, I’m honored.

    Though we will certainly make mistakes and fall prone to our sinful nature, it is the act following him, maintaining our humility, repenting of our evil deeds, and loving and keeping faith in Him that makes us who we are (we can argue theology later…not to mention the fact that I surely got something wrong here…but I’m a music major, not a Religion or theology major!)

    Wow, nicely said… BTW I find music majors to be some of the most thoughtful, intellegent and wise of all… ;) It just so happens I was a music major too…

    I think what you are doing is awesome! The idea that it may be construed as irreverent… so what?? I don’t think it is, but even if it was, so what?? For some time now I have been advocating thinking outside the box when approaching Scripture. Many people settle into one particular way of reading scripture (eg. literal, metaphorical, inerrant, errant, etc) and what they get out of it is very limited. I fully advocate looking at it from as many perspectives as possible to find overlapping Truth. From some of the comments in the Fox article as well as your post here, I think that’s precisely the result of the Terror Texts.

    Out of curiosity, you said you weren’t using the Lot passage… what are the Scriptures that you are using.


  7. @Chris:

    Just as the ways in which he purges evil today are not quite so obvious. Some would say that he no longer does so.

    Well, I’m not one for speculation on what God does and doesn’t do, but I certainly think He hates evil as much today as He ever did. What you see today is that if anyone dare to speculate that some event is God’s justice they are soundly chastised and criticized, called intolerant and religious nuts. Whether that’s deserved or not…? probably for the most part, but I’ll leave that up to others to decide.


  8. My name is Andrew and i have also had the privilege to be a part of the cast of terror texts, and i would agree with everything Austin said previously and say he summarized it accurately.

    the first act of our show includes 5 shorter stories from the old testament including:

    The Woman Who Ate Her Own Son (2 Sammuel 6:24-7:20)
    The Bald Man and the Bears (2 Kings 2:23-25Open Link in New Window)
    David’s Dance (2 Samuel 6:1-23Open Link in New Window)
    The Fat King (Judges 3:12-30Open Link in New Window)
    The Valley of Trouble (Joshua 7:2-26Open Link in New Window)

    then the second act of terror texts changes and portrays only one story

    the levite’s concubine (Judges 19-21Open Link in New Window)


  9. Hello everyone, first I’d like to say that I am thrilled with the attention this show is now getting, and I hope this idea of performing the Ancient Plays of Israel (The Bible) will become more widespread because of it.

    I am the scenic designer for the show, and have been a part of this project since its beginning. Some of this has already been said, so I’m sorry if I repeat some things Austin has already touched on.

    Terror Texts is peek into an unknown world, a terrifying world. These are some of the toughest stories in the Bible, and because of this, they are rarely preached on and certainly not taught in Sunday School. Indeed, cannibalism, rape, murder, war…it’s all there. And it begs the question, ‘Why?’ …and why are these stories so hard to understand? Why has God allowed such wickedness?

    Terror Texts does not make an attempt to answer the question “why?” …but rather to ask it again, by shedding a new light on it. It begs the audience to ‘Look, see, hear, remember…’ Look at what humanity is capable of, even the people of God. These were real people, and these things did happen. When you read words on a page, they may not seems as real. There is a disconnect. Watch these stories come to life, and you get this realization of ‘wow, why? What is my connection to this? How does this affect me in MY world?’

    These stories are dark. But when the darkness gets darker, the brightness shines brighter. There are moments of holiness and beauty in these texts that become more apparent when you SEE them on stage, rather that just on a page.

    I’m not discrediting the Scriptures as they are. God’s Word is powerful, and God will uses it for his purposes. But there are so many treasures within the scriptures that we as a theatre company have uncovered that have made us react to the texts in a totally different way.

    To sum up, These texts beg the question ‘why’…why did this happen? And the show begs the audience not to toss these stories aside and forget about them. These stories have long been shoved in the corner, and read only in personal devotions. There may be a sermon on one of them once in a while, but I think we can all agree it’s rare. These stories are in Scripture, these people did exist, and God has something to say through them…both through their good deeds, and their evil deeds. Well here’s a new way of looking at it, a new way to try and sort it out. We don’t have an answer to the question ‘why’ …we’re just finding new ways keep trying. What do you make of it?


  10. Andrew and Vaughn,

    Wow, thanks for taking the time (along with Austin) to come by and comment. First, thanks for the scripture references, I can’t wait to dive into them again…

    I’m not discrediting the Scriptures as they are.

    Not at all… I think (the little I know about Terror Texts) that what you are doing is exposing these passages to people from a new perspective, a perspective so radical that it forces them to leave behind the normal baggage they carry when approaching them. It’s really cool.

    And the show begs the audience not to toss these stories aside and forget about them. These stories have long been shoved in the corner, and read only in personal devotions. … These stories are in Scripture, these people did exist, and God has something to say through them

    Absolutely… couldn’t have said it better myself (though I’ve been trying…) I experience the same kind of awakening last year when reading Leviticus again with a clear mind. So now you guys are covering some of the other texts… we need to tackle Numbers next…

    We were talking about Terror Texts tonight at church. Logistically, doing an east coast thing is probably a pretty far reach, but we all agreed that we’d buy a DVD of a performance to watch together… hint, hint…


  11. I love to hear that people are talking about this, with the limited knowledge you have. The music is available to listen to at http://www.myspace.com/terrortextsthemusical …they are the studio recordings performed by our composer, Joseph Barker, and his band based in Minneapolis.

    And while you’re correct in assuming that getting 60 people out to the east coast for a performance is logistically an issue right now, a DVD can definitely be sent your way! I actually headed up the filming of this show, so why don’t you email me a mailing address and once it’s complete (give me up to a month, now that the show is done I can focus on other stuff finally!).

    You can reach me at vaughn****@***il.com [edit:contact blog author]. Also, on the myspace page is a trailer for a recently completed documentary on the journey we’ve gone through here at Northwestern with these Ancient Plays of Israel. If this is of interest to you, I can probably manage to send a copy along with the finished DVD edit of the show. I’m excited to get this stuff out to others so they can discuss and ponder and discover.


  12. Thanks for the link. The soundtrack is awesome.

    Here’s the You Tube trailer for the performance, I hope you don’t mind me re-posting it here:


  13. Man, I turn my head for just one second and look what I miss! Cool stuff. Definitely going to check it out.

    Buddy, I think you misread me. I am not one of those who thinks God does not purge evil anymore. I was just trying to point out that it’s not always so obvious; it’s necessarily the tidal wave or the hurricane or the earthquake. Maybe sometimes it can be something as innocuous as an economic recession. Or Mr. Potter’s lonely death bed.

    I like the idea that we can identify with some of these horrific characters from the Old Testament. I think it’s pretty easy to NOT identify with them, but perhaps that’s not the point.


  14. I was wondering where you were….

    No, I got you… I think it’s one of those taboo subjects. In no way can we know or even suppose that an event is “the wrath of God”, to even suggest such a thing is possible makes you a pariah and a hater… just ask Jerry Falwell… or those folks down in Kansas…

    Most of the time in Bible studies, when studying these ‘dark tales’ we look at the player to point out how wrong they are. I don’t ever remember reading it to see myself in those characters. Come to think of it, that’s how a lot of us look at people all the time…


  15. As some of you know, I am a great-grandmother (although not old enough to be one…at least in my mind!). I tell you this because the appeal of this portrayal of the bible is not just to the youger-generation. After seeing the trailer I am SO excited about this concept. I can’t wait to get my hands on the DVD. I’m even tempted to travel to Iowa to see the live show if it is performed again! Please keep us informed.


  16. great-grandmother!! wow you’re old…


  17. I don’t think Falwell got beat up for talking about the wrath of God he got called on the carpet for INVOKING the wrath of God, something I doubt anyone is qualified to do in these days - him, Robertson or the Pope.

    And isn’t that the real problem here? Why can’t some of these fire breathers stop second guessing God and let Him take His vengeance on who He will. He doesn’t need us to make suggestions.

    Funny thing, a lot of those invokers end up getting smote themselves, don’t they?


  18. That’s not how I remembered it…

    Here’s a transcript of the exchange between Falwell and Robertson that I was referring to:

    Transcript

    This is post-attack, so it wasn’t an invocation, he was claiming that a particular act (9/11) was due to God pulling away His ‘curtain of protection’ as a result of America turning away from Him.

    So, Falwell was roundly chastised and force to publicly apologize for his remarks. Now quite honestly I can’t say that he was wrong… (gasp!)… I can’t say that he was right either. I haven’t been endowed with the gift of prophesy or given visions to be able to clearly discern Gods intentions. Was it a ‘nice’ thing to blame people for that terror? Of course not, but I wonder how many friends Isaiah, Jeremiah, Jonah, Micah, et al had… I wonder if they were publicly chastised for some of the stuff they said…

    Am I claiming Falwell was right for what he said or that he’s a prophet? no… but is it possible that he could have been right? Does God purge evil anymore??

    I like what you said, Chris, that he does so in lots of ways that aren’t so dramatic. But does that mean He never is dramatic?


  19. Sure. Just like Reverend Wright. Both guys think that America as historically somewhat culpable for the attacks. And I happen to agree with that premise - doesn’t make it right. And just because someone believes something is not good justification for saying. Anyway, Falwell and Robertson have never taken your view; ‘could be, but then again…”. They claim to have God’s ear and vice versa. When really it would be just as accurate to flip a coin.

    But who forced Falwell to apologize?


  20. But did God smote all those people in the towers because the USA (like the USA is somehow special in the eyes of God) went off the moral path? Innocents killed because others are not innocent? On the other hand, has America’s course over the years in some way led to this? In the same way that slavery led to the horrors of the Civil War? Perhaps.

    Or perhaps God had as little to do with these thing as he did with the collapsing tower at Shiloam.


  21. Yeah, I know, I am a chronic lurker, but I just can’t deal.

    “Or perhaps God had as little to do with these thing as he did with the collapsing tower at Shiloam.”

    Now, how in the heck do you figure this considering the context?

    It must come from this presumption, “Innocents killed because others are not innocent?” but this presumption is completely incongruent with the passage about the tower at Siloam.

    Your later statement is contextually unsound all by itself, but put together with the other quote, your idea is completely biblically incoherent.


  22. They claim to have God’s ear

    Can you say with 100% certainty that they don’t? Do true prophets no longer exists?

    But who forced Falwell to apologize?

    Forced…? ok, but heavy pressure was put on him, even from the White House.

    What’s your evidence that God had nothing to do with the collapse of the Siloam tower? I don’t see proof one way or the other about that. You seem to be reading more into the text than is actually there.

    Jason! Wass up dude?


  23. Hiya Bud.

    I really appreciate what you have been laying down.


  24. Hey, you said forced, not me. He could’ve stuck to his guns.

    PART of what I think we can infer from that passage in Luke was that Jesus was telling the folks that the Galileans who suffered under Pilate and those who died in the tower accident did not do so because they were being punished for wickedness.

    I’m not saying that God had nothing to do with these things. We just don’t know how much. Of course we can get into that argument that if allowed to happen that is the same as him causing it to happen, the ones the atheists often use to paint God as some sort of immature tyrant. But Pilate was bad, the terrorists were bad, the guy who skimped on the good mortar for the tower was bad - heck, we’re all bad to some degree. We do things that often result in catastrophe and heart ache. And we better start getting our acts together because the clock is ticking.


  25. should read “if HE allowed IT to happen…” 6:00 am and my eyes are still bleary.


  26. “PART of what I think we can infer from that passage in Luke was that Jesus was telling the folks that the Galileans who suffered under Pilate and those who died in the tower accident did not do so because they were being punished for wickedness”

    ummm

    Luke 13:4-5Open Link in New Window do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? 5 No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”

    Is there any way to take the tone of this other than those in Jerusalem are just as bad, and so are you, and I, and we will *likewise* perish? That Christ applies the fate of those in Siloam to all, in that, they either repent or are punished for being “offenders” is all I can see that is inferred.

    However, like I said, the immediately previous pericope is one in which people are being dragged before a judge for an offense for which they will have to pay back every penny. Jesus is not talking about debtors prison here, he is talking about what he came for (12:51)…so who is the judge and executor of the sentence in this metaphor?

    Then immediately afterward, the parable of the fig tree. Who is the vinedresser, who is the owner, and who is the fig tree in this parable.

    The passages which sandwich the passage in question should leave no doubt that indeed God does it and we deserve it, that we are all likewise offenders and unless we repent will meet a similar fate.

    “the ones the atheists often use to paint God as some sort of immature tyrant”

    so?


  27. Unless I’ve misread you, I wouldn’t think either of you would see things like the fall of the tower as punishment for non-repentance. I think that’s what Jesus is saying; “Look you are no better than those people. That’s not why they died. But beware, be prepared. It could happen to you, at any moment. You’re all on borrowed time, so repent, now.”

    The atheist line sort of goes like; “If God’s omnipotent and he allows evil well then he must have created evil and thereby in some way must be evil”. So…I think we need to be careful before we start saying things like God sent the tidal wave, or the hurricane or the planes. No, scratch that, I think that we need not say things like that at all.

    Yeah, I think prophets exist. But who really knows which ones they are, eh? Might be that guy walking around downtown, naked as a jaybird with the dog poop on his head. Might even be Jerry and Pat. Gosh. My money’s on the guy downtown.


  28. I’m not saying that God had nothing to do with these things. We just don’t know how much.

    Exactly my point. We don’t know. There’s not any information on that point… so… there is some other point that Jesus is trying to get across. I think Jason nails it here. When one (not meaning you in particular) reads the passage without baggage, preconceived ideas or an agenda.. just clearly.. Jesus is basically saying “You are all sinners and you need to repent. God (the vineyard owner) has given you (all of us… the fig tree) fair chance to get straight and time is just about up. I (Jesus, the groundskeeper) have intervened on your behalf to give you more time, but that time is short.

    Getting back to the original topic, that’s how many people approach these “Terror Texts”… either with an agenda to prove something about God or they dismiss the texts because what it might say doesn’t jibe with their preconceived ideas about God. My thing is that I believe God speaks to us through every bit of His word; sometimes we don’t get it because we are looking for something else, or not looking at all….

    C said: “Look you are no better than those people. That’s not why they died.”

    Where do you get that from in the text?

    No, scratch that, I think that we need not say things like that at all.

    I would agree with that unless God specifically tells you that He did those things and He wants you to tell others.

    Pat actually has said that God has talked to him. Who are we to say he’s wrong..?.. just because what he said makes us squirm…?.. I wonder how many people squirmed when Isaiah spoke…?


  29. Everyone brings baggage to the text. You, me, Jason - everyone. Unless we are someone like Chauncy Gardiner, who brings perhaps a bit less baggage. Why is baggage that bad? I mean, unless you can literally place yourself in the shoes of, let’s say….the multitude on the mount, then you are going to bring your own perspective to the story.

    Where do you get that from in the text?

    Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no!…Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!”

    That’s how I read it.

    Who are we to say he’s wrong..?

    Because Pat has, at other times, made predictions based upon what he says God has told him and he has been…incorrect. I don’t think he’s lying, I think he believes it. But so have other, perhaps more questionable, “prophets”.


  30. Hey, was Isaiah a tycoon? And who was Isaiah talking to? I don’t think Pat tries to make too many people within the American church squirm too much.Who is Pat trying to convict? Is it those who consider themselves God’s people or their enemies? Ah, but this is where these kinds of analogies fall off


  31. “I think we need to be careful before we start saying things like God sent the tidal wave, or the hurricane or the planes. No, scratch that, I think that we need not say things like that at all”

    OK, there are any number of problems here. Firstly, you are approaching this with a temporal presupposition. If one is to hold to God’s eternality then he created everything while - at the very least - knowing what will come to pass. If you’re going to chose to abandon this then you have a problem with prophet-downtown-mumbler, not that he is able to prophecy that one particular thing will come to pass, but that all previous things will come to pass so that the one particular thing will come to pass. There is complete certainty that God is in control of minutia in these circumstances, so to take the absence of evidence of Providence in matters such as the bridge collapse or the Tsunami is to presume that God is either unaware or unable.

    We cannot declare why things have come to pass, (if we are going theorize about why then we need to be putting it on ourselves) but to say that God is separate from it is to say that suffering has no foreknown, intended purpose, only the god of slow reflexes trying to make the best of that big mess that happened while he had his feet up watching the Steelers having an Iron City.

    “Everyone brings baggage to the text. You, me, Jason - everyone”

    This only avoids the fact that the narrative - that is, how things happened - has an obvious theological lean. There comes a point at which the words need to mean something. I mean, I understood everything you said…but I have all this baggage! How could I comprehend you at all? heh

    “That’s how I read it”

    Another life changing moment of biblical exposition. You can get the whole set for 39.95.


  32. Why is baggage that bad? I mean, unless you can literally place yourself in the shoes of, let’s say….the multitude on the mount, then you are going to bring your own perspective to the story.

    Perspective is one thing, I would argue that multiple perspectives is vital to understanding.

    It’s the ellipses (…) that become problematic. By cutting out a key part of what Jesus was saying (or adding text for that matter) you are now re-writing scripture to fit your agenda. In your qutoation above you said:

    I tell you, no!…Or those instead of:
    I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those
    Why would you leave that out?

    Now punctuation… you could argue there since there was no punctuation in the original text. So:

    Jesus wept.
    Jesus wept…
    Jesus wept?
    Jesus wept?!?
    Jesus wept!!

    All valid ways to read it, none of them contradict and together they paint a picture. But of course it would be kind of silly to read that phrase alone. You need the entire context of John 11Open Link in New Window to even know why He wept. Then some of those punctuations might not make any sense.

    Cut and paste theology can be dangerous.

Leave a reply

Rev22: Whoever Is Thirsty, Let Him Come is using WP-Gravatar